Review: Jimmyjane Iconic Wand

jimmyjane-iconic-wand-2

It’s funny that Jimmyjane made a toy called the Iconic Wand when the sex toy world already has an iconic wand. It’s a bit like if Samsung launched a phone called the Iconic Smartphone (bonus points if it was formatted like “iConic”). Like, dude: you’re not fooling anyone.

But I should quit hatin’ on this toy, because it’s actually pretty decent.

My first exposure to the Iconic Wand was when JoEllen mentioned it while I was in Portland. She said that the controls were in an inconvenient place (which they are – more on that in a minute) but I was nonetheless intrigued by the wand’s beautifully simplistic look and its promise of “deep, rumbling vibrations.” So I asked Peepshow Toys to send me one to try, and they hooked me up, like the vibrator angels that they are.

Let’s get this out of the way: the Iconic Wand’s buttons are positioned so oddly that it seems like the toy wasn’t tested by humans prior to its release. Or at least, not by humans with normal wrists with bones and tendons. In order to switch the wand’s mode or speed one-handed, you have to hold it so far down the handle that you’re almost touching the head. Not ideal, Jimmyjane. The toy’s gently curved handle is otherwise very ergonomic and feels good in the hand; this vibe could’ve been improved substantially by just shifting the buttons a few inches up. But alas.

The controls themselves are easy to figure out. There’s a power button and a button that cycles through the wand’s modes and speeds. It has three solid speeds and four patterns, and while I don’t normally love patterns, these ones are kind of great: there’s not a lot of space in between pulses and escalations, so they can actually be a turn-on rather than a drag.

The vibrations are, as advertised, rumbly and strong. YAY. It’s damn impressive that Jimmyjane managed to pack such a punch into a toy that’s only about two-thirds the size of the Hitachi, especially given that Jimmyjane’s vibrations have historically erred on the side of buzzy and inconsistent.

jimmyjane-iconic-wand

While I think the Iconic Wand’s vibrations are more than strong enough to give wonderful orgasms to most folks, it doesn’t work all that well for me, because of its shape. The top of the wand is completely rounded off, so I can’t tilt it for a more pinpointed sensation on my clit like I can with more angular wands. It delivers broad, all-over vulva stimulation, unless I use my other hand to hold my labia wide open – and who wants to do that when that hand could be operating a dildo instead?

The Iconic Wand also vibrates the fuck out of my hand no matter where I grip it. Grrr.

But, you know, it looks very pretty while it’s doing that.

I think the Iconic Wand is a marvelous choice if you want a super-powerful vibrator without the size or weight of a standard massager vibe. It’s elegant, waterproof (!!), has great speeds and patterns, and is possibly one of the best things Jimmyjane’s ever made. But if you need pinpoint stimulation or subtler vibrations, or if you have any wrist mobility issues at all, I would skip this one. After all, the Magic Wand Rechargeable is about $10 cheaper and it’s a tried-and-true classic – it is actually iconic, and for good reason.

Thanks so much to the good folks at Peepshow Toys for supplying me with this toy!

  • How would you compare it to the Smart Wand Large? And given the small size I assume it can’t work with any of the “wand attachments”?

    • Girly Juice

      My Smart Wand died long ago so unfortunately I can’t compare, but I think they are roughly the same in terms of power. The Iconic Wand is maybe sliiiightly buzzier.

      And yeah, the head is substantially narrower than the Magic Wand head so its attachments wouldn’t work unless you were cool with a loose fit.

  • Tzipora

    It occurred to me while reading your review that the Iconic Wand is basically the Kanye West of wand toys. Talented enough but so much ego. 😛 I can picture this wand jumping in front of someone praising the Hitachi and being all “Imma let you finish but I’m the wand of the century, I’m ICONIC.” Lol.

    And oh boy those buttons. I was thinking before I saw them that well for me at least I grip wand toys primarily with my thumb towards the bottom end of the handle. But if you were using it as like a body massager or on someone else for any reason you’d most likely grasp it with your thumb facing the other way, towards the head so I figured eh maybe that’s why, the whole lets pass this off as a back massager thing. Then I saw the photo of the buttons and was like whaaat?! Maybe if it was shaped more like Hitachi versus the weird ergonomic bend that wouldn’t be so bad but seriously? Just looking at it, it seems all wrong.

    • ahhaaaha your Kanye West metaphor is ON POINT. It’s good, but not as good as it thinks it is…?!